Romaine lettuce cultivar ranger

ABSTRACT

The invention provides seed and plants of the romaine lettuce cultivar designated cv. Ranger. The invention thus relates to the plants, seeds and tissue cultures of romaine lettuce cv. Ranger, and to methods for producing a lettuce plant produced by crossing a plant of romaine lettuce cv. Ranger with itself or with another lettuce plant, such as a plant of another line. The invention further relates to seeds and plants produced by such crossing. The invention further relates to parts of a plant of romaine lettuce line cv. Ranger, including the gametes of such plants.

FIELD

The present invention relates to the field of plant breeding and, more specifically, to the development of romaine lettuce cultivar (cv.) Ranger.

BACKGROUND

The goal of vegetable breeding is to combine various desirable traits in a single variety/hybrid. Such desirable traits may include greater yield, resistance to insects or pests, tolerance to heat and drought, better agronomic quality, higher nutritional value, growth rate and fruit properties.

Breeding techniques take advantage of a plant's method of pollination. There are two general methods of pollination: a plant self-pollinates if pollen from one flower is transferred to the same or another flower of the same plant or plant variety. A plant cross-pollinates if pollen comes to it from a flower of a different plant variety.

Plants that have been self-pollinated and selected for type over many generations become homozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a uniform population of true breeding progeny, a homozygous plant. A cross between two such homozygous plants of different varieties produces a uniform population of hybrid plants that are heterozygous for many gene loci. Conversely, a cross of two plants each heterozygous at a number of loci produces a population of hybrid plants that differ genetically and are not uniform. The resulting non-uniformity makes performance unpredictable.

The development of uniform varieties requires the development of homozygous inbred plants, the crossing of these inbred plants, and the evaluation of the crosses. Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection are examples of breeding methods that have been used to develop inbred plants from breeding populations. Those breeding methods combine the genetic backgrounds from two or more plants or various other broad-based sources into breeding pools from which new lines are developed by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes. The new lines are evaluated to determine which of those have commercial potential.

SUMMARY

In one aspect, the present invention provides a romaine lettuce plant designated cv. Ranger. Also provided are lettuce plants having the physiological and morphological characteristics of the romaine lettuce designated cv. Ranger. Parts of the romaine lettuce plant of the present invention are also provided, for example, including pollen, an ovule, and a cell of the plant.

The invention also concerns seed of romaine lettuce cv. Ranger. The lettuce seed of the invention may be provided as an essentially homogeneous population of romaine lettuce seed of cv. Ranger. Essentially homogeneous populations of seed are generally free from substantial numbers of other seed. In certain embodiments of the invention, seed of cv. Ranger may be provided forming at least about 97% of the total seed, including at least about 98%, 99%, or more of the seed. The population of lettuce seed may be particularly defined as being essentially free from hybrid seed. The seed population may be separately grown to provide an essentially homogeneous population of romaine lettuce plants designated cv. Ranger.

In another aspect of the invention, a plant of romaine lettuce cv. Ranger comprising an added heritable trait is provided. The heritable trait may comprise a genetic locus that is a dominant or recessive allele. In one embodiment of the invention, a plant of romaine lettuce cv. Ranger is defined as comprising a single locus conversion. In specific embodiments of the invention, an added genetic locus confers one or more traits such as, for example, herbicide tolerance, insect resistance, disease resistance, and modified carbohydrate metabolism. The trait may be, for example, conferred by a naturally occurring gene introduced into the genome of the line by backcrossing, a natural or induced mutation, or a transgene introduced through genetic transformation techniques into the plant or a progenitor of any previous generation thereof. When introduced through transformation, a genetic locus may comprise one or more transgenes integrated at a single chromosomal location.

In another aspect of the invention, a tissue culture of regenerable cells of a plant cv. Ranger is provided. The tissue culture will preferably be capable of regenerating plants capable of expressing all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of the line, and of regenerating plants having substantially the same genotype as other plants of the line. Examples of some of the physiological and morphological characteristics of the cv. Ranger include those traits set forth in the tables herein. The regenerable cells in such tissue cultures may be derived, for example, from embryos, meristems, cotyledons, pollen, leaves, anthers, roots, root tips, pistil, flower, seed and stalks. Still further, the present invention provides lettuce plants regenerated from a tissue culture of the invention, the plants having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of cv. Ranger.

In yet another aspect of the invention, processes are provided for producing lettuce seeds and plants, which processes generally comprise crossing a first parent lettuce plant with a second parent lettuce plant, wherein at least one of the first or second parent lettuce plants is a plant of cv. Ranger. These processes may be further exemplified as processes for preparing hybrid lettuce seed or plants, wherein a first lettuce plant is crossed with a second lettuce plant of a different, distinct line to provide a hybrid that has, as one of its parents, the romaine lettuce plant cv. Ranger. In these processes, crossing will result in the production of seed. The seed production occurs regardless of whether the seed is collected or not.

In one embodiment of the invention, the first step in “crossing” comprises planting seeds of a first and second parent lettuce plant, often in proximity so that pollination will occur for example, mediated by insect vectors. Alternatively, pollen can be transferred manually. Where the plant is self-pollinated, pollination may occur without the need for direct human intervention other than plant cultivation.

A second step may comprise cultivating or growing the seeds of first and second parent lettuce plants into plants that bear flowers. A third step may comprise preventing self-pollination of the plants, such as by emasculating the male portions of flowers, (i.e., treating or manipulating the flowers to produce an emasculated parent lettuce plant). Self-incompatibility systems may also be used in some hybrid crops for the same purpose. Self-incompatible plants still shed viable pollen and can pollinate plants of other varieties but are incapable of pollinating themselves or other plants of the same line.

A fourth step for a hybrid cross may comprise cross-pollination between the first and second parent lettuce plants. Yet another step comprises harvesting the seeds from at least one of the parent lettuce plants. The harvested seed can be grown to produce a lettuce plant or hybrid lettuce plant.

The present invention also provides the lettuce seeds and plants produced by a process that comprises crossing a first parent lettuce plant with a second parent lettuce plant, wherein at least one of the first or second parent lettuce plants is a plant designated cv. Ranger. In one embodiment of the invention, lettuce seed and plants produced by the process are first generation (F₁) hybrid lettuce seed and plants produced by crossing a plant in accordance with the invention with another, distinct plant. The present invention further contemplates plant parts of such an F₁ hybrid lettuce plant, and methods of use thereof. Therefore, certain exemplary embodiments of the invention provide an F₁ hybrid lettuce plant and seed thereof.

In still yet another aspect of the invention, the genetic complement of the romaine lettuce plant designated cv. Ranger is provided. The phrase “genetic complement” is used to refer to the aggregate of nucleotide sequences, the expression of which sequences defines the phenotype of, in the present case, a lettuce plant, or a cell or tissue of that plant. A genetic complement thus represents the genetic makeup of a cell, tissue or plant, and a hybrid genetic complement represents the genetic make-up of a hybrid cell, tissue or plant. The invention thus provides lettuce plant cells that have a genetic complement in accordance with the lettuce plant cells disclosed herein, and plants, seeds and plants containing such cells.

Plant genetic complements may be assessed by genetic marker profiles, and by the expression of phenotypic traits that are characteristic of the expression of the genetic complement, e.g., isozyme typing profiles. It is understood that cv. Ranger or a first generation progeny thereof could be identified by any of the many well-known techniques such as, for example, Simple Sequence Length Polymorphisms (SSLPs) (Williams et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1 8:6531-6535, 1990), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Arbitrary Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs) (EP 534 858, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) (Wang et al., Science, 280:1077-1082, 1998).

In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides hybrid genetic complements, as represented by lettuce plant cells, tissues, plants, and seeds, formed by the combination of a haploid genetic complement of a lettuce plant of the invention with a haploid genetic complement of a second lettuce plant, preferably, another, distinct lettuce plant. In another aspect, the present invention provides a lettuce plant regenerated from a tissue culture that comprises a hybrid genetic complement of this invention.

In still yet another aspect, the invention provides a method of determining the genotype of a plant of romaine lettuce cv. Ranger comprising detecting in the genome of the plant at least a first polymorphism. The method may, in certain embodiments, comprise detecting a plurality of polymorphisms in the genome of the plant. The method may further comprise storing the results of the step of detecting the plurality of polymorphisms on a computer readable medium. The invention further provides a computer readable medium produced by such a method.

In still yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of producing a plant derived from cv. Ranger, the method comprising the steps of: (a) preparing a progeny plant derived from cv. Ranger, wherein said preparing comprises crossing a plant of the cv. Ranger with a second plant; and (b) crossing the progeny plant with itself or a second plant to produce a seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation. In further embodiments, the method may additionally comprise: (c) growing a progeny plant of a subsequent generation from said seed of a progeny plant of a subsequent generation and crossing the progeny plant of a subsequent generation with itself or a second plant; and repeating the steps for an additional 3-10 generations to produce a plant derived from cv. Ranger. The plant derived from cv. Ranger may be an inbred line, and the aforementioned repeated crossing steps may be defined as comprising sufficient inbreeding to produce the inbred line. In the method, it may be desirable to select particular plants resulting from step (c) for continued crossing according to steps (b) and (c). By selecting plants having one or more desirable traits, a plant derived from cv. Ranger is obtained which possesses some of the desirable traits of the line as well as potentially other selected traits.

In certain embodiments, the present invention provides a method of producing lettuce comprising: (a) obtaining a plant of romaine lettuce cv. Ranger, wherein the plant has been cultivated to maturity, and (b) collecting lettuce from the plant.

Any embodiment discussed herein with respect to one aspect of the invention applies to other aspects of the invention as well, unless specifically noted.

The term “about” is used to indicate that a value includes the standard deviation of error for the device or method being employed to determine the value. The use of the term “or” in the claims is used to mean “and/or” unless explicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternatives are mutually exclusive, although the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives and to “and/or.” When used in conjunction with the word “comprising” or other open language in the claims, the words “a” and “an” denote “one or more,” unless specifically noted. The terms “comprise,” “have” and “include” are open-ended linking verbs. Any forms or tenses of one or more of these verbs, such as “comprises,” “comprising,” “has,” “having,” “includes” and “including,” are also open-ended. For example, any method that “comprises,” “has” or “includes” one or more steps is not limited to possessing only those one or more steps and also covers other unlisted steps. Similarly, any plant that “comprises,” “has” or “includes” one or more traits is not limited to possessing only those one or more traits and covers other unlisted traits.

Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and any specific examples provided, while indicating specific embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 . Mature leaf of cultivar Ranger.

FIG. 2 . Fourth leaf of cultivar Ranger.

FIG. 3 . Pedigree of cultivar Ranger.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention provides methods and compositions relating to plants, seeds and derivatives of romaine lettuce cv. Ranger. This line shows uniformity and stability within the limits of environmental influence for the traits described hereinafter. Lettuce cv. Ranger provides sufficient seed yield. By crossing with a distinct second plant, uniform F1 hybrid progeny can be obtained.

In another embodiment, the invention provides a vigorous romaine lettuce cultivar adapted for production in the Central California (CA) coastal region, as well as Imperial County, CA and Yuma County, AZ. The sowing dates for this variety are all 12 months. Cv. Ranger was selected for medium to large size with good weight, having resistance to lettuce necrotic stunt virus (also known as, tomato bushy stunt virus) and tipburn, compared to the most similar commercial cultivar, cv. River Road, as well as cvs. Lompoc and Toro.

The areas of adaptation of cv. Ranger include Santa Cruz, San Benito, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Riverside, Imperial Counties of California, and Yuma County of Arizona.

A. Origin and Breeding History of Lettuce cv. Ranger

The creation of cv. Ranger began in 2014 with the cross between cv. Klamath and cv. Sharp Shooter. The female was cv. Klamath (romaine) and the male cv. Sharp Shooter (iceberg), both sold in the past by Seminis Vegetable Seeds. Single plant selections were made in subsequent years until the F6 generation in 2017, when two lines were selected out of line 801116→801116-1 and 801116-5, for potential commercial release. The next year, 2017, line 801116-1 was re-selected to create two new lines 801116-1→801116-1-3 and 801116-1-5 for commercial release and subsequently, three lines were developed as separate lines. In 2020, the three lines were named as cv. Ranger (801116-1-5), cv. Lompoc (801116-1-3), and cv. Toro (801116-5-1). Field trials of cv. Ranger were carried out in both 2019 and 2020, using F₈ and F₉ seed.

The breeding work was conducted by Dr. William Waycott of Nipomo Native Seeds, LLC, Nipomo, Calif. Replicated field trials were placed in commercial production areas of California during 2019 and 2020.

B. Physiological and Morphological Characteristics of Romaine Lettuce cv. Ranger

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a plant having the physiological and morphological characteristics of lettuce cv. Ranger. A description of the physiological and morphological characteristics of lettuce cv. Ranger is presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Physiological and Morphological Characteristics of Romaine Lettuce cv. Ranger and cv. River Road Romaine Lettuce cv. Ranger (No. Characteristic T0070-914085) cv. River Road 1-x plant type Green Romaine SEED 2-1 seed color black 2-x light dormancy light not required 2-x heat dormancy susceptible SEEDLING x-2 seedling anthocyanin absent x-3 cotyledon size medium x-4 cotyledon shape medium eliptical 3-x cotyledon shape intermediate FOURTH LEAF 3-x fourth leaf shape elongated 3-x fourth leaf attached 3-x fourth leaf, length/width ratio 2.8 3-x fourth leaf, apical margin entire 3-x fourth leaf, basal margin entire 3-x fourth leaf, undulation slight 3-x fourth leaf, green color green 3-x fourth leaf, anthocyanin N/A distribution 3-x fourth leaf, anthocyanin N/A concentration 3-x fourth leaf, rolling absent 3-x fourth leaf, cupping uncupped 3-x fourth leaf, reflexing none 10-12 LEAF x-5 mature leaf, attitude erect x-6 mature leaf, blade divisions entire MATURE PLANT 4-x mature leaf x-28 mature leaf, incisions, present absent apical part 4-29 mature leaf, incisions shallow absent depth, apical part x-30 mature leaf, incisions sparse absent density, apical part x-31 mature leaf, incisions sinuate absent type, apical part x-32 mature leaf, venation not flabellate not flabellate (flabellate = ginkgo) 4-x mature leaf, indentation crenate crenate 4-27 mature leaf, undulation, absent weak apical part 4-x mature leaf, color dark green dark green x-18 mature leaf, color hue N/A N/A x-19 mature leaf, color intensity dark dark x-20 mature leaf, anthocyanin N/A N/A x-21 mature leaf, anthocyanin N/A N/A intensity 4-22 mature leaf, anthocyanin N/A N/A distribution 4-x mature leaf, anthocyanin N/A N/A concentration x-23 mature leaf, kind of anthocyanin N/A N/A 4-x mature leaf, leaf size large large 4-24 mature leaf, glossiness, moderate moderate upper side 4-25 mature leaf, blistering very strong moderate x-26 mature leaf, blister size large large 4-14 mature leaf, thickness thick thick 4-x mature leaf, trichomes absent absent x-15 mature leaf, attitude at harvest erect erect x-16 mature leaf, shape broad obtrullate broad obtrullate x-17 mature leaf, shape at tip obtuse obtuse 5-x mature plant, spread 38.7 cm 35.6 cm x-7 mature plant, diameter large large x-36 mature plant, height tall tall x-37 mature plant, fasciation absent absent x-38 mature plant, fasciation intensity none none x-8 mature plant, head formation open head open head x-9 mature plant, head type N/A N/A 5-x mature plant, head diameter 31.2 cm 27.8 cm 5-x mature plant, head shape elongate elongate x-13 mature plant, longitudinal narrow elliptic narrow elliptic cross-section 5-11 mature plant, head size large large 5-x mature plant, heads/carton 24 heads 24 heads 5-x mature plant, head weight 1,047 g 902 g 5-10 mature plant, head firmness medium medium 6-x mature plant, bottom shape rounded rounded 6-x mature plant, bottom midrib prominently moderately raised raised 7-x mature plant, core diameter 46 mm 43 m 7-x mature plant, head dia/core 6.8 6.5 dia ratio 7-x mature plant, core height 77 mm 89 mm BOLTING 8-x bolting, first date Jul. 30, 2020 Jul. 30, 2020 8-x bolting, days to bolting 65 days 55 days 8-x bolting class medium medium x-35 bolting, stalk medium medium 8-x bolting, height 150 cm 163 cm 8-x bolting, spread 40 cm 48 cm 8-x bolting, leaves curved curved 8-x bolting, margin entire entire 8-x bolting, color medium green medium green 8-x bolting terminal inflorescence present present 8-x bolting, lateral shoots present present 8-x bolting, basal side shoots absent absent x-33, bolting, axillary sprouting medium medium x-34, bolting, harvest maturity medium medium *These are typical values. Values may vary due to environment. Other values that are substantially equivalent are also within the scope of the invention.

C. Breeding Romaine Lettuce cv. Ranger

One aspect of the current invention concerns methods for crossing the romaine lettuce cv. Ranger with itself or a second plant and the seeds and plants produced by such methods. These methods can be used for propagation of cv. Ranger or can be used to produce hybrid lettuce seeds and the plants grown therefrom. Hybrid seeds are produced by crossing cv. Ranger with second lettuce parent line.

The development of new varieties using one or more starting varieties is well known in the art. In accordance with the invention, novel varieties may be created by crossing cv. Ranger followed by multiple generations of breeding according to such well-known methods. New varieties may be created by crossing with any second plant. In selecting such a second plant to cross for the purpose of developing novel lines, it may be desired to choose those plants which either themselves exhibit one or more selected desirable characteristics or which exhibit the desired characteristic(s) when in hybrid combination. Once initial crosses have been made, inbreeding and selection take place to produce new varieties. For development of a uniform line, often five or more generations of selfing and selection are involved.

The breeding method employed was pedigree selection, using both single plant selection and mass selection practices. The selection criteria for cv. Ranger were to identify a romaine variety with acceptable size and weight, having resistance to lettuce necrotic stunt virus, as well as resistance to tipburn (enhanced translocation of calcium in young developing leaves).

In another embodiment, uniform lines of new varieties may also be developed by way of double haploids. This technique allows the creation of true breeding lines without the need for multiple generations of selfing and selection. In this manner true breeding lines can be produced in as little as one generation. Haploid embryos may be produced from microspores, pollen, anther cultures, or ovary cultures. The haploid embryos may then be doubled autonomously, or by chemical treatments (e.g. colchicine treatment). Alternatively, haploid embryos may be grown into haploid plants and treated to induce chromosome doubling. In either case, fertile homozygous plants are obtained. In accordance with the invention, any of such techniques may be used in connection with cv. Ranger and progeny thereof to achieve a homozygous line.

New varieties may be created, for example, by crossing cv. Ranger with any second plant and selection of progeny in various generations and/or by doubled haploid technology. In choosing a second plant to cross for the purpose of developing novel lines, it may be desired to choose those plants which either themselves exhibit one or more selected desirable characteristics or which exhibit the desired characteristic(s) in progeny. After one or more lines are crossed, true-breeding lines may be developed.

Backcrossing can also be used to improve an inbred plant. Backcrossing transfers a specific desirable trait from one inbred or non-inbred source to an inbred that lacks that trait. This can be accomplished, for example, by first crossing a superior inbred (A) (recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (non-recurrent parent), which carries the appropriate locus or loci for the trait in question. The progeny of this cross are then mated back to the superior recurrent parent (A) followed by selection in the resultant progeny for the desired trait to be transferred from the non-recurrent parent. After five or more backcross generations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny are heterozygous for loci controlling the characteristic being transferred, but are like the superior parent for most or almost all other loci. The last backcross generation would be selfed to give pure breeding progeny for the trait being transferred.

The line of the present invention is particularly well suited for the development of new lines based on the elite nature of the genetic background of the line. In selecting a second plant to cross with cv. Ranger for the purpose of developing novel lettuce lines, it will typically be preferred to choose those plants which either themselves exhibit one or more selected desirable characteristics or which exhibit the desired characteristic(s) when in hybrid combination.

D. Performance Characteristics of Romaine Lettuce cv. Ranger

As described above, cv. Ranger exhibits desirable performance traits. The results of an analysis of such traits are presented below.

TABLE X Evaluation of romaine cv. Ranger, cv. Lompoc, and cv. Toro and the most similar cultivar, cv. River Road, for Head Diameter, Head Weight, Head Height, Outer Leaf Blister, and Days Until Stem Reaches to 15 cm, showing means, standard deviation, and range of variation at the 95% confidence level. Trial Cultivar Head Head Head Outer Leaf Days to Number (cv.) Rep No. Diameter^(a) Weight^(b) Height^(c) Blisterd 15 cm^(e) Trial 1: cv. Ranger Rep. 1 30.7 ± 0.4 957 ± 27.9 34.4 ± 0.7 2.2 ± 0.1 64.7 ± 0.8 Evaluated Rep. 2 31.3 ± 0.4 1201 ± 28.1  34.9 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.2 65.5 ± 0.7 August 21, Average: 31.0 ± 0.4 1079 ± 28.0  34.7 ± 0.6 2.15 ± 0.2  65.1 ± 0.8 2019; Chualar, CA cv. Lompoc Rep. 1 33.9 ± 0.5 935 ± 29.1 32.8 ± 0.6 2.2 ± 0.2 66.1 ± 0.9 Rep. 2 34.8 ± 0.4 988 ± 28.4 31.5 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.2 63.9 ± 0.8 Average: 34.4 ± 0.5 962 ± 28.8 32.2 ± 0.6 2.15 ± 0.2  65.0 ± 0.9 cv. Toro Rep. 1 29.0 ± 0.5 744 ± 26.7 30.3 ± 0.5 2.2 ± 0.2 67.3 ± 0.6 Rep. 2 29.6 ± 0.4 780 ± 28.2 29.6 ± 0.7 2.3 ± 0.1 65.8 ± 0.8 Average: 29.3 ± 1.5 762 ± 27.5 30.0 ± 0.6 2.25 ± 0.2  66.6 ± 0.7 cv. River Road Rep. 1 27.7 ± 0.4 881 ± 27.2 36.2 ± 0.6 2.25 ± 0.2  66.6 ± 0.7 Rep. 2 27.2 ± 0.4 928 ± 28.2 36.8 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.1 53.5 ± 0.5 Average: 27.5 ± 0.4 905 ± 27.7 36.5 ± 0.6 0.35 ± 0.1  54.4 ± 0.6 Trial 2: cv. Ranger Rep. 1 31.2 ± 0.5 1055 ± 27.5  34.5 ± 0.5 2.4 ± 0.2 64.6 ± 0.7 Evaluated Rep. 2 31.4 ± 0.5 972 ± 27.7 34.7 ± 0.5 2.2 ± 0.1 65.1 ± 0.7 August 27, 2020; Soledad, CA Average: 31.3 ± 0.5 979 ± 27.6 34.6 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.2 64.9 ± 0.7 cv. Lompoc Rep. 1 34.4 ± 0.5 971 ± 28.1 31.6 ± 0.7 2.2 ± 0.2 66.4 ± 0.8 Rep. 2 34.1 ± 0.5 987 ± 28.2 32.2 ± 0.6 2.3 ± 0.2 65.9 ± 0.8 Average: 34.3 ± 0.5 979 ± 28.2 31.9 ± 0.7 2.25 ± 0.2  66.2 ± 0.8 cv. Toro Rep. 1 30.3 ± 0.5 815 ± 28.6 29.9 ± 0.7 2.1 ± 0.1 64.3 ± 0.6 Rep. 2 30.0 ± 0.4 777 ± 28.4 28.8 ± 0.7 2.3 ± 0.2 65.8 ± 0.8 Average: 30.2 ± 0.5 796 ± 28.5 29.4 ± 0.7 2.2 ± 0.2 65.1 ± 0.7 cv. River Road Rep. 1 27.6 ± 0.4 878 ± 27.8 35.7 ± 0.7 0.4 ± 0.1 54.2 ± 0.7 Rep. 2 28.2 ± 0.5 899 ± 28.4 36.5 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.1 55.7 ± 0.6 Average: 27.9 ± 0.5 889 ± 28.1 36.5 ± 0.6 0.35 ± 0.1  55.0 ± 0.7 Range of variation among means of statistically significant differences at the 95% level using 1 confidence interval [CI = mean ± (SDXSE)]: cv. Ranger 30.6 to 31.8 1039.8 to 1052.2 34.5 to 34.7 2.16 to 2.26 64.8 to 65.9 cv. Lompoc 33.7 to 34.9 963.6 to 976.4 31.9 to 32.1 2.15 to 2.25 65.3 to 66.2 cv. Toro 29.1 to 30.3 772.7 to 785.3 29.6 to 29.8 2.18 to 2.28 65.7 to 66.5 cv. River Road 27.1 to 28.3 890.8 to 903.2 36.2 to 36.5 0.33 to 0.37 54.3 to 54.8 ^(a)Mean head diameter using two sowing dates of 20 plants per replication in cm ± standard deviation. ^(b)Mean head weight using two sowing dates of 20 plants per replication in grams ± standard deviation. ^(c)Mean number of days until stem reaches 15 cm using two replications of 20 plants each ± standard deviation. ^(d)Mean of the number of leaf blisters per square centimeter, using two sowing dates of 20 plants per replication ± standard deviation. ^(e)Mean number of days until stem reaches 15 cm using two replications of 20 plants each, ± standard deviation.

In replicated field trials of cv. Ranger, during 2019 and 2020, covering generations F8 and F9, no genetic variants nor off-types have been observed in more than 5,000 individuals, indicating these lines are genetically uniform and stable.

In replicated field trials, heads of cv. Ranger were consistently smaller in diameter than cv. Lompoc, (31.2 cm vs. 34.4 cm), but larger than both cvs. Toro and River Road (29.7 cm, 27.7 cm; Table 2). However, cv. Ranger was heavier than all other cultivars (1,047 g vs. 971 g, 779 g, 897 g, respectively). When measured for head height, cv. River Road was tallest, followed by cvs. Ranger, Lompoc, and Toro, (36.3 cm, 34.7 cm vs. 33.4 cm, 29.7 cm, respectively). Measurements of outer leaf blistering indicated cvs. Ranger, Lompoc, and Toro had more blisters per square centimeter than cv. River Road (2.2, 2.3, 2.25, and 0.35, respectively), while measurements of days for the stem to reach 15 cm in height did not differ greatly different between cv. Ranger, Lompoc, and Toro (65.4, 65.6, 65.8, respectively), however were later when compared to cv. River Road (54.7), indicating cvs. Ranger, Lompoc, and Toro take longer to initiate stem elongation (bolting).

The data presented here, for the four traits mentioned above, are statistically different at the 95% confidence level, exhibiting a range of means for head diameter, head weight, head height, outer leaf blistering, and days to 15 cm for the four cultivars evaluated (Table 2). Therefore, these data illustrate that cv. Ranger differed significantly from cvs. Lompoc, and Toro, while also differing from the most similar variety, cv. River Road, in field trials conducted in 2019 and 2020. For these reasons, romaine cv. Ranger illustrates unique characteristics not observed during evaluations of the most similar variety, cv. River Road, nor with cvs. Lompoc and Toro.

E. Further Embodiments of the Invention

In specific embodiments, the invention provides plants modified to include at least a first desired heritable trait. Such plants may, in one embodiment, be developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing, wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of a variety are recovered in addition to a genetic locus transferred into the plant via the backcrossing technique. The terms converted plant or single locus converted plant as used herein refers to those lettuce plants which are developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing, wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of a variety are recovered in addition to the single locus transferred into the variety via the backcrossing technique. By essentially all of the morphological and physiological characteristics, it is meant that the characteristics of a plant are recovered that are otherwise present when compared in the same environment, other than an occasional variant trait that might arise during backcrossing or direct introduction of a transgene. It is understood that a locus introduced by backcrossing may or may not be transgenic in origin, and thus the term backcrossing specifically includes backcrossing to introduce loci that were created by genetic transformation.

Backcrossing methods can be used with the present invention to improve or introduce a characteristic into the present variety. The parental lettuce plant which contributes the locus for the desired characteristic is termed the nonrecurrent or donor parent. This terminology refers to the fact that the nonrecurrent parent is used one time in the backcross protocol and therefore does not recur. The parental lettuce plant to which the locus or loci from the nonrecurrent parent are transferred is known as the recurrent parent as it is used for several rounds in the backcrossing protocol.

In a typical backcross protocol, the original variety of interest (recurrent parent) is crossed to a second variety (nonrecurrent parent) that carries the single locus of interest to be transferred. The resulting progeny from this cross are then crossed again to the recurrent parent and the process is repeated until a lettuce plant is obtained wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of the recurrent parent are recovered in the converted plant, in addition to the single transferred locus from the nonrecurrent parent.

The selection of a suitable recurrent parent is an important step for a successful backcrossing procedure. The goal of a backcross protocol is to alter or substitute a single trait or characteristic in the original variety. To accomplish this, a single locus of the recurrent variety is modified or substituted with the desired locus from the nonrecurrent parent, while retaining essentially all of the rest of the desired genetic, and therefore the desired physiological and morphological constitution of the original variety. The choice of the particular nonrecurrent parent will depend on the purpose of the backcross; one of the major purposes is to add some commercially desirable trait to the plant. The exact backcrossing protocol will depend on the characteristic or trait being altered to determine an appropriate testing protocol. Although backcrossing methods are simplified when the characteristic being transferred is a dominant allele, a recessive allele may also be transferred. In this instance it may be necessary to introduce a test of the progeny to determine if the desired characteristic has been successfully transferred.

In one embodiment, progeny lettuce plants of a backcross in which cv. Ranger is the recurrent parent comprise (i) the desired trait from the non-recurrent parent and (ii) all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of romaine lettuce cv. Ranger as determined at the 5% significance level when grown in the same environmental conditions.

Lettuce varieties can also be developed from more than two parents. The technique, known as modified backcrossing, uses different recurrent parents during the backcrossing. Modified backcrossing may be used to replace the original recurrent parent with a variety having certain more desirable characteristics or multiple parents may be used to obtain different desirable characteristics from each.

With the development of molecular markers associated with particular traits, it is possible to add additional traits into an established germ line, such as represented here, with the end result being substantially the same base germplasm with the addition of a new trait or traits. Molecular breeding, as described in Moose and Mumm, 2008 (Plant Physiology, 147: 969-977), for example, and elsewhere, provides a mechanism for integrating single or multiple traits or QTL into an elite line. This molecular breeding-facilitated movement of a trait or traits into an elite line may encompass incorporation of a particular genomic fragment associated with a particular trait of interest into the elite line by the mechanism of identification of the integrated genomic fragment with the use of flanking or associated marker assays. In the embodiment represented here, one, two, three or four genomic loci, for example, may be integrated into an elite line via this methodology. When this elite line containing the additional loci is further crossed with another parental elite line to produce hybrid offspring, it is possible to then incorporate at least eight separate additional loci into the hybrid. These additional loci may confer, for example, such traits as a disease resistance or a fruit quality trait. In one embodiment, each locus may confer a separate trait. In another embodiment, loci may need to be homozygous and exist in each parent line to confer a trait in the hybrid. In yet another embodiment, multiple loci may be combined to confer a single robust phenotype of a desired trait.

Many single locus traits have been identified that are not regularly selected for in the development of a new inbred but that can be improved by backcrossing techniques. Single locus traits may or may not be transgenic; examples of these traits include, but are not limited to, male sterility, herbicide resistance, resistance to bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, insect resistance, restoration of male fertility, modified fatty acid or carbohydrate metabolism, and enhanced nutritional quality. These comprise genes generally inherited through the nucleus.

Direct selection may be applied where the single locus acts as a dominant trait. An example of a dominant trait is the downy mildew resistance trait. For this selection process, the progeny of the initial cross are sprayed with downy mildew spores prior to the backcrossing. The spraying eliminates any plants which do not have the desired downy mildew resistance characteristic, and only those plants which have the downy mildew resistance gene are used in the subsequent backcross. This process is then repeated for all additional backcross generations.

Selection of lettuce plants for breeding is not necessarily dependent on the phenotype of a plant and instead can be based on genetic investigations. For example, one can utilize a suitable genetic marker which is closely genetically linked to a trait of interest. One of these markers can be used to identify the presence or absence of a trait in the offspring of a particular cross, and can be used in selection of progeny for continued breeding. This technique is commonly referred to as marker assisted selection. Any other type of genetic marker or other assay which is able to identify the relative presence or absence of a trait of interest in a plant can also be useful for breeding purposes. Procedures for marker assisted selection applicable to the breeding of lettuce are well known in the art. Such methods will be of particular utility in the case of recessive traits and variable phenotypes, or where conventional assays may be more expensive, time consuming or otherwise disadvantageous. Types of genetic markers which could be used in accordance with the invention include, but are not necessarily limited to, Simple Sequence Length Polymorphisms (SSLPs) (Williams et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1 8:6531-6535, 1990), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs), Arbitrary Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs) (EP 534 858, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) (Wang et al., Science, 280:1077-1082, 1998).

F. Plants Derived from Romaine Lettuce cv. Ranger by Genetic Engineering

Many useful traits that can be introduced by backcrossing, as well as directly into a plant, are those which are introduced by genetic transformation techniques. Genetic transformation may therefore be used to insert a selected transgene into the lettuce line of the invention or may, alternatively, be used for the preparation of transgenes which can be introduced by backcrossing. Methods for the transformation of plants, including lettuce, are well known to those of skill in the art.

Vectors used for the transformation of lettuce cells are not limited so long as the vector can express an inserted DNA in the cells. For example, vectors comprising promoters for constitutive gene expression in lettuce cells (e.g., cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter) and promoters inducible by exogenous stimuli can be used. Examples of suitable vectors include pBI binary vector. The “lettuce cell” into which the vector is to be introduced includes various forms of lettuce cells, such as cultured cell suspensions, protoplasts, leaf sections, and callus.

A vector can be introduced into lettuce cells by known methods, such as the polyethylene glycol method, polycation method, electroporation, Agrobacterium-mediated transfer, particle bombardment and direct DNA uptake by protoplasts. See, e.g., Pang et al. (The Plant J., 9, 899-909, 1996).

To effect transformation by electroporation, one may employ either friable tissues, such as a suspension culture of cells or embryogenic callus or alternatively one may transform immature embryos or other organized tissue directly. In this technique, one would partially degrade the cell walls of the chosen cells by exposing them to pectin-degrading enzymes (pectolyases) or mechanically wound tissues in a controlled manner. An example of electroporation of lettuce protoplasts is presented in Chupeau et al. (Bio/Tech., 7:503-508, 1989).

A particularly efficient method for delivering transforming DNA segments to plant cells is microprojectile bombardment. In this method, particles are coated with nucleic acids and delivered into cells by a propelling force. Exemplary particles include those comprised of tungsten, platinum, and preferably, gold. For the bombardment, cells in suspension are concentrated on filters or solid culture medium. Alternatively, immature embryos or other target cells may be arranged on solid culture medium. The cells to be bombarded are positioned at an appropriate distance below the macroprojectile stopping plate.

An illustrative embodiment of a method for delivering DNA into plant cells by acceleration is the Biolistics Particle Delivery System, which can be used to propel particles coated with DNA or cells through a screen, such as a stainless steel or Nytex screen, onto a surface covered with target lettuce cells. The screen disperses the particles so that they are not delivered to the recipient cells in large aggregates. It is believed that a screen intervening between the projectile apparatus and the cells to be bombarded reduces the size of projectiles aggregate and may contribute to a higher frequency of transformation by reducing the damage inflicted on the recipient cells by projectiles that are too large.

Microprojectile bombardment techniques are widely applicable, and may be used to transform virtually any plant species. Examples involving microprojectile bombardment transformation with lettuce can be found in, for example, Elliott et al. (Plant Cell Rep., 18:707-714, 2004) and Molinier et al. (Plant Cell Rep., 21:251-256, 2002).

Agrobacterium-mediated transfer is another widely applicable system for introducing gene loci into plant cells. An advantage of the technique is that DNA can be introduced into whole plant tissues, thereby bypassing the need for regeneration of an intact plant from a protoplast. Modern Agrobacterium transformation vectors are capable of replication in E. coli as well as Agrobacterium, allowing for convenient manipulations (Klee et al., Bio-Technology, 3(7):637-642, 1985). Moreover, recent technological advances in vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer have improved the arrangement of genes and restriction sites in the vectors to facilitate the construction of vectors capable of expressing various polypeptide coding genes. The vectors described have convenient multi-linker regions flanked by a promoter and a polyadenylation site for direct expression of inserted polypeptide coding genes. Additionally, Agrobacterium containing both armed and disarmed Ti genes can be used for transformation.

In those plant strains where Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is efficient, it is the method of choice because of the facile and defined nature of the gene locus transfer. The use of Agrobacterium-mediated plant integrating vectors to introduce DNA into plant cells is well known in the art (Fraley et al., Bio/Technology, 3:629-635, 1985; U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,055). For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,349,124 describes a method of transforming lettuce plant cells using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. By inserting a chimeric gene having a DNA coding sequence encoding for the full-length B.t. toxin protein that expresses a protein toxic toward Lepidopteran larvae, this methodology resulted in lettuce having resistance to such insects.

Transformation of plant protoplasts also can be achieved using methods based on calcium phosphate precipitation, polyethylene glycol treatment, electroporation, and combinations of these treatments (see, e.g., Potrykus et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 199:183-188, 1985; Omirulleh et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 21(3):415-428, 1993; Fromm et al., Nature, 312:791-793, 1986; Uchimiya et al., Mot Gen. Genet., 204:204, 1986; Marcotte et al., Nature, 335:454, 1988). Transformation of plants and expression of foreign genetic elements is exemplified in Choi et al. (Plant Cell Rep., 13: 344-348, 1994) and Ellul et al. (Theor. Appl. Genet., 107:462-469, 2003).

A number of promoters have utility for plant gene expression for any gene of interest including but not limited to selectable markers, scoreable markers, genes for pest tolerance, disease resistance, nutritional enhancements and any other gene of agronomic interest. Examples of constitutive promoters useful for lettuce plant gene expression include, but are not limited to, the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) P-35S promoter, which confers constitutive, high-level expression in most plant tissues (see, e.g., Odel et al., Nature, 313:810, 1985), including monocots (see, e.g., Dekeyser et al., Plant Cell, 2:591, 1990; Terada and Shimamoto, Mol. Gen. Genet., 220:389, 1990); a tandemly duplicated version of the CaMV 35S promoter, the enhanced 35S promoter (P-e35S) the nopaline synthase promoter (An et al., Plant Physiol., 88:547, 1988), the octopine synthase promoter (Fromm et al., Plant Cell, 1:977, 1989); and the figwort mosaic virus (P-FMV) promoter as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,378,619 and an enhanced version of the FMV promoter (P-eFMV) where the promoter sequence of P-FMV is duplicated in tandem, the cauliflower mosaic virus 19S promoter, a sugarcane bacilliform virus promoter, a commelina yellow mottle virus promoter, and other plant DNA virus promoters known to express in plant cells.

A variety of plant gene promoters that are regulated in response to environmental, hormonal, chemical, and/or developmental signals can be used for expression of an operably linked gene in plant cells, including promoters regulated by (1) heat (Callis et al., Plant Physiol., 88:965, 1988), (2) light (e.g., pea rbcS-3A promoter, Kuhlemeier et al., Plant Cell, 1:471, 1989; maize rbcS promoter, Schaffner and Sheen, Plant Cell, 3:997, 1991; or chlorophyll a/b-binding protein promoter, Simpson et al., EMBO 1, 4:2723, 1985), (3) hormones, such as abscisic acid (Marcotte et al., Plant Cell, 1:969, 1989), (4) wounding (e.g., wunl, Siebertz et al., Plant Cell, 1:961, 1989); or (5) chemicals such as methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, or Safener. It may also be advantageous to employ organ-specific promoters (e.g., Roshal et al., EMBO 1, 6:1155, 1987; Schernthaner et al., EMBO J., 7:1249, 1988; Bustos et al., Plant Cell, 1:839, 1989).

Exemplary nucleic acids which may be introduced to the lettuce lines of this invention include, for example, DNA sequences or genes from another species, or even genes or sequences which originate with or are present in the same species, but are incorporated into recipient cells by genetic engineering methods rather than classical reproduction or breeding techniques. However, the term “exogenous” is also intended to refer to genes that are not normally present in the cell being transformed, or perhaps simply not present in the form, structure, etc., as found in the transforming DNA segment or gene, or genes which are normally present and that one desires to express in a manner that differs from the natural expression pattern, e.g., to over-express. Thus, the term “exogenous” gene or DNA is intended to refer to any gene or DNA segment that is introduced into a recipient cell, regardless of whether a similar gene may already be present in such a cell. The type of DNA included in the exogenous DNA can include DNA which is already present in the plant cell, DNA from another plant, DNA from a different organism, or a DNA generated externally, such as a DNA sequence containing an antisense message of a gene, or a DNA sequence encoding a synthetic or modified version of a gene.

Many hundreds if not thousands of different genes are known and could potentially be introduced into a lettuce plant according to the invention. Non-limiting examples of particular genes and corresponding phenotypes one may choose to introduce into a lettuce plant include one or more genes for insect tolerance, such as a Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) gene, pest tolerance such as genes for fungal disease control, herbicide tolerance such as genes conferring glyphosate tolerance, and genes for quality improvements such as yield, nutritional enhancements, environmental or stress tolerances, or any desirable changes in plant physiology, growth, development, morphology or plant product(s). For example, structural genes would include any gene that confers insect tolerance including but not limited to a Bacillus insect control protein gene as described in WO 99/31248, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, U.S. Pat. No. 5,689,052, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,500,365 and 5,880,275, herein incorporated by reference it their entirety. In another embodiment, the structural gene can confer tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate as conferred by genes including, but not limited to Agrobacterium strain CP4 glyphosate resistant EPSPS gene (aroA:CP4) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,435, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, or glyphosate oxidoreductase gene (GOX) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,463,175, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Alternatively, the DNA coding sequences can affect these phenotypes by encoding a non-translatable RNA molecule that causes the targeted inhibition of expression of an endogenous gene, for example via antisense- or cosuppression-mediated mechanisms (see, for example, Bird et al., Biotech. Gen. Engin. Rev., 9:207, 1991). The RNA could also be a catalytic RNA molecule (i.e., a ribozyme) engineered to cleave a desired endogenous mRNA product (see for example, Gibson and Shillito, Mol. Biotech., 7:125, 1997). Thus, any gene which produces a protein or mRNA which expresses a phenotype or morphology change of interest is useful for the practice of the present invention.

G. Definitions

In the description and tables herein, a number of terms are used. In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, the following definitions are provided:

Allele: Any of one or more alternative forms of a gene locus, all of which alleles relate to one trait or characteristic. In a diploid cell or organism, the two alleles of a given gene occupy corresponding loci on a pair of homologous chromosomes.

Backcrossing: A process in which a breeder repeatedly crosses hybrid progeny, for example a first-generation hybrid (F₁), back to one of the parents of the hybrid progeny. Backcrossing can be used to introduce one or more single locus conversions from one genetic background into another.

Converted (Conversion) Plant: Plants which are developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing, wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of a lettuce line are recovered in addition to the trait transferred into the variety via the backcrossing technique and/or by genetic transformation.

Crossing: The mating of two parent plants.

Cross-pollination: Fertilization by the union of two gametes from different plants.

Diploid: A cell or organism having two sets of chromosomes.

Emasculate: The removal of plant male sex organs or the inactivation of the organs with a cytoplasmic or nuclear genetic factor conferring male sterility or a chemical agent.

Enzymes: Molecules which can act as catalysts in biological reactions.

F₁ Hybrid: The first-generation progeny of the cross of two nonisogenic plants.

Genotype: The genetic constitution of a cell or organism.

Haploid: A cell or organism having one set of the two sets of chromosomes in a diploid.

Linkage: A phenomenon wherein alleles on the same chromosome tend to segregate together more often than expected by chance if their transmission was independent.

Marker: A readily detectable phenotype, preferably inherited in codominant fashion (both alleles at a locus in a diploid heterozygote are readily detectable), with no environmental variance component, i.e., heritability of 1.

Phenotype: The detectable characteristics of a cell or organism, which characteristics are the manifestation of gene expression.

Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL): Quantitative trait loci (QTL) refer to genetic loci that control to some degree numerically representable traits that are usually continuously distributed.

Regeneration: The development of a plant from tissue culture.

Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) color chart value: The RHS color chart is a standardized reference which allows accurate identification of any color. A color's designation on the chart describes its hue, brightness and saturation. A color is precisely named by the RHS color chart by identifying the group name, sheet number and letter, e.g., Yellow-Orange Group 19A or Red Group 41B.

Self-pollination: The transfer of pollen from the anther to the stigma of the same plant.

Substantially Equivalent: A characteristic that, when compared, does not show a statistically significant difference (e.g., p=0.05) from the mean.

Tetraploid: A cell or organism having four sets of chromosomes.

Tissue Culture: A composition comprising isolated cells of the same or a different type or a collection of such cells organized into parts of a plant.

Transgene: A genetic locus comprising a sequence which has been introduced into the genome of a lettuce plant by transformation.

Triploid: A cell or organism having three sets of chromosomes.

H. Deposit Information

A deposit of romaine lettuce cv. Ranger, disclosed above and recited in the claims, has been made with the Provasoli-Guillard National Center for Marine Algae and Microbiota (NCMA), 60 Bigelow Drive, East Boothbay, Me. U.S.A., as NCMA Accession No. 202202026. The date of deposit was Feb. 23, 2022. Upon issuance of a patent, all restrictions upon the deposit will be removed, and the deposit is intended to meet all of the requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 1.801-1.809. The accession number for those deposited seeds of red leaf lettuce cv. Ranger is Accession No. 202202030. The deposit will be maintained in the depository for a period of 30 years, or 5 years after the last request, or for the effective life of the patent, whichever is longer, and will be replaced, if necessary, during that period.

Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the invention, as limited only by the scope of the appended claims.

All references cited herein are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A seed of red leaf lettuce cv. Ranger, a sample of seed of the line having been deposited under NCMA Accession No.
 202202030. 2. A plant grown from the seed of claim
 1. 3. A plant part of the plant of claim
 2. 4. The plant part of claim 3, wherein the plant part is selected from the group consisting of an embryo, a meristem, a cotyledon, pollen, a leaf, an anther, a root, a root tip, a pistil, a flower, a seed, and a stalk.
 5. A lettuce plant or a part thereof, having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of the lettuce plant of claim
 2. 6. A tissue culture of the plant of claim
 2. 7. The tissue culture according to claim 6, comprising cells or protoplasts from a plant part selected from the group consisting of an embryo, a meristem, a cotyledon, pollen, a leaf, an anther, a root, a root tip, a pistil, a flower, a seed and a stalk.
 8. A lettuce plant regenerated from the tissue culture of claim 6, wherein the regenerated plant expresses all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of red leaf lettuce cv. Ranger, a sample of seed of the line having been deposited under NCMA Accession No.
 202202030. 9. A method of producing lettuce seed, comprising crossing the plant of claim 2 with a second lettuce plant.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the plant of red leaf lettuce cv. Ranger is the female parent.
 11. The method of claim 9, wherein the plant of red leaf lettuce cv. Ranger is the male parent.
 12. An F₁ hybrid seed produced by the method of claim
 9. 13. An F₁ hybrid plant produced by growing the seed of claim
 12. 14. A method for producing a seed of a red leaf lettuce cv. Ranger-derived lettuce plant comprising the steps of: (a) crossing a lettuce plant of red leaf lettuce cv. Ranger, a sample of seed of the line having been deposited under NCMA Accession No. 202202030, with a second lettuce plant; and (b) allowing seed of a cv. Ranger-derived lettuce plant to form.
 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising the steps of: (a) crossing a plant grown from said cv. Ranger-derived lettuce seed with itself or a second lettuce plant to yield additional cv. Ranger-derived lettuce seed; (b) growing said additional cv. Ranger-derived lettuce seed of step (a) to yield additional cv. Ranger-derived lettuce plants; and (c) repeating the crossing and growing steps of (a) and (b) to generate further cv. Ranger-derived lettuce plants.
 16. A method of producing a plant of red leaf lettuce cv. Ranger comprising an added desired trait, the method comprising introducing a transgene conferring the desired trait into a plant of red leaf lettuce cv. Ranger, wherein a sample of seed of the line has been deposited under NCMA Accession No.
 202202030. 17. A method of producing food comprising: (a) obtaining the plant of claim 2, and (b) collecting leaf tissue from the plant, wherein the leaf tissue is capable of use as food. 